LEARNING & TEACHING
  • Home
  • Passions
  • Experience
  • Learning
    • COETAIL >
      • Orientation
      • Course One
      • Course Two
      • Course Three
      • Course Four
      • Course Five
  • Blog

Education is not the learning of facts, but training the mind to think.

- Albert Einstein

Celebrating the journey

4/6/2019

8 Comments

 
Picture
Photo credit: Pexels.com

I work in Studio 5 at the International School of Ho Chi Minh City (ISHCMC). It's a personalized learning environment that puts learner agency at the core of our belief system. As an advisor, I'm often asked questions like...
​
  • How do you track growth?
  • How do you know where your learners are at and their next steps?
  • How do you communicate this to your learners? Their parent(s)/guardian(s)?
  • What do you assess? How is it tracked?

In this post, I hope to elucidate what I do, which looks fairly similar amongst my colleagues, yet with some nuanced perspectives and ideas to make it their own. In other words, it is "a way", not "the way".
Picture
Image adapted from Pexels.com

Assessment Philosophy

We, in Studio 5, don't believe in assigning numbers or grades to students; there's a significant amount of evidence about their lack of efficacy towards motivating students to learn. Thus, we believe in advising learners towards becoming intrinsically motivated in what they want to learn about (i.e. placing importance on learning how to learn). We value developing lifelong authentic skills over anything else.

Since our studio model operates within the context of the IB's PYP, the Enhanced Approaches to Learning (AtLs) make a lot of sense to use as our assessment vehicle. First, they were just redeveloped and introduced this year in the enhancements to the PYP; this translates to longer-term stability. In addition, the AtLs are present (with growing complexity) throughout the MYP and DP frameworks of the IB, therefore adding carry-over in the continuum of a learner's journey. 

These ideals in what we value stem from the Learning and teaching section of the enhanced PYP documentation. The IB posits that, the AtLs "are grounded in the belief that learning how to learn is fundamental to a student’s education."  These "skills also help to support students’ sense of agency, encouraging them to see their learning as an active and dynamic process" (IBO, p.  26).

Any educator that currently works with these AtLs knows that they are not easy to synthesize and interpret from the PYP documentation alone. To simplify these AtLs for all stakeholders in our community, we use a modified interpretation of the skills in infographic form developed by a former advisor, Suzanne Kitto (@OrenjiButa). 
Picture

​Tracking Growth

Instead of grades, we use a Studio 5 designed continuum called the 
Gradual Increase in Independence (GII). Ultimately, our goal is for the kids to lead, or at least be independent in relation to their approaches to learning (AtLs). More metaphorically speaking, we want them to be in the driver's seat of their learning journey. 
Picture
Another @OrenjiButa creation

A PYP Philosopy

To help guide what our studio model planning, learning and assessment looks like in depth, it's important to note that we are not just pulling stars out of the sky in our ideals. All of our philosophies are deeply rooted within the philosophy of the enhanced PYP framework. The bullets below are particularly salient to our everyday practice:
Picture
Learning and teaching, IBO, p. 28

Long term planning

Over the course of the year, we, as an entire school, have a year long inquiry into "Who we are" as learners, individuals and as a community. Our exhibition (PYPx) lends itself nicely to "Where we are in place and time" for our children to reflect on their culmination of learning within the PYP before embarking into the MYP. This leaves the rest of the year open in terms of our Programme of Inquiry (PoI) to allow the children to set sail in three different Self Directed Units of Inquiry (SDUoIs). I know you may think that my math is wrong here, but SDUoIs tend to be trans-transdisciplinary (yes, we made that one up), leaving lots of room for balanced, horizontal articulation in our grade level.

​As advisors, we assist our learners in backwards planning their SDUoIs on six week timelines. During week seven, we host mini-exhibitions (or as we like to call, a "Take it Public" - otherwise known as TIP) in between SDUoI cycles. We give our children the agency in how they choose to TIP, which I have blogged about here, and so has my colleague, Taryn, here.

These TIP events also are wonderful low entry, high ceiling, and, what Mitch Resnick at MIT's Media Lab likes to call, "wide wall", celebrations that showcase learning journeys. They also help spark ideas, innovation, iterations and motivation for the next round of SDUoIs, which students spend the rest of week seven planning for. In general, to overly simplify our long term plan, it would look something along the lines of this:
Picture
Note that WWA lasts year long, but we spend a very concentrated focus in the first term.

As mentioned above, many of the SDUoIs that the children plan, tend to hit several transdisciplinary themes. We get our students to track this in hyperdoc assessment folders that are shared with their parents and advisors. The aim of this is keeping the transparency window of communication and support open.  

By planning for the whole year Who we are unit and having our PYPx as Where we are in place and time, this offers the learners flexibility to either "Pivot or Persevere" in their self-directed inquiries in terms of the time allotted for each inquiry. We keep the traditional six week plan as it gives our learners an adequate amount of time to inquire deeply into something they are passionate about. In addition, from a time management perspective, it gives an authentic deadline to prepare for in regards to taking their learning public. Some inquiries do need longer than six weeks and/or continue to motivate children to persevere. When that happens, we, as advisors, help our learners to continue to step further out of their comfort zone.  
Picture
Students, with the help of advisors, track their themes. This is visible to all stakeholders in their shared assessment folders.

Pre-planning - Setting a purpose

To help our inspire our learners, we help them in finding their autonomy, mastery and purpose (ultimately their motivation), stemming from Daniel Pink's work in his book Drive.

​At the beginning and throughout the year, we, as advisors, offer a variety of workshops ranging from writing stories, cooking, photography, dance and more. We encourage our kids to do the same; some run workshops on slime making, Scratch tutorials and more. All of this aids our learners in finding their intrinsic motivation for what they are passionate to learn more about.


For those that need a little further inspiration as to what to inquire into, we use this question grid as a diving board:
Picture
After a purpose is set, the final piece of the puzzle is a Simon Sinek fueled "Why, How and What" purpose planner. These planners help with initial conferencing to push our learners out of their comfort zones and also help connect them with the wider community (my colleague Taryn has documented this in great detail here).
Picture

Inquiring and reflecting on achievement

After all the pre-planning and reorganization of learning spaces to reflect the context of the inquiries, the wheels are in motion! Children have their specific weekly goals for their SDUoIs from their six week backwards planners, of which they expand upon in greater detail in their weekly goals.

In my advisory, learners set four SMART weekly goals on Monday morning. The first is a personal goal which can be anything in their life. Children tend to balance out their screen-time, get better at their mindfulness practice, or aim to be better humans in their connections with others. The second goal is a communication goal, related to any AtL within that skill family. Third is a math goal and the last is their weekly SDUoI goal. 
Picture
Picture
Picture

By the end of the week, the expectation of my learners is that they have a face-to-face conference showing the documentation of their SDUoI, math and communications skills goals. To help with the transparency piece with parents, children post their set goals on Monday to their portfolios, then also reflect mid-week on the progress of their achievement.

In terms of the weekly timetable, we keep things open, save single subject pullouts. Each day revolves around the PYP's action cycle of "Choose-Act-Reflect" (commonly known as CAR time). The first and last block of each day, I have my specific learners that are under my pastoral care. However, during the middle blocks, these are the "ACT" blocks where our learners connect with peer and experts all around our community. Advisors are all diversified in their expertise and are working with a wide range of children, Studio wide, throughout these act times, not just the ones in their advisory. The only expectation is that their homeroom, or CAR time, advisor knows where they are and that an adult is in the area to supervise them wherever they are. Morning CAR blocks allow for check-in, choosing and planning their day and setting goals for the week (i.e. "CHOOSE" blocks). The last period of the day involves reflection, documentation and thinking about next steps (i.e. "REFLECT" blocks). 

Here is an example of a day planner that our learners complete and conference with an advisor on before they "ACT":
Picture
Each learner "chooses" how they will "act" out their day in the morning. Then "reflects" at the day's end and thinks about next steps for the following day.

Where do the math and communication skill goals come from?

Probably the question that we're asked most often.

Unlike any other school, we spend time to get to know our learners. We use diagnostic tools in order to garner that information through interviews like Probe, Gloss and looking at writing samples. That data gets analyzed, broken down into communicable and actionable next steps, then verbally communicated to the learner. This information also gets shared and put into their assessment folder, which is their "one-stop shop" hyperdoc platform that is shared with parents with commenting rights. 
Picture
Picture
Picture

Aside from these diagnostics, we also get our students to notice, name and document next steps when they arise. This could be when they notice a pattern when reading through research and/or pleasure. Or it could be when they are writing their daily reflections, their own end of term evaluations for reporting, or in their documentation. Sometimes it may be through the feedback they get after taking it public, or something they noticed themselves. As an advisor, I'm always looking to assist my learners with the notice and naming of this real-time, authentic feedback in the context of whatever they may be doing. Through open-ended questions, it further develops my learner's metacognition to achieve that end goal -- to be the driver's of their own learning journey.

More specifically for maths, we also triangulate the data for next steps through the diagnostic grade-level assessments on Khan academy and get learners to save the results by concept area for actionable next steps. Another data point is through the notice and naming within the context of their self-directed units. It may be looking at symmetry through a photographic lens, measurement when building things up in our FabLab, and/or determining  profits from entrepreneurial sales during market days and determining the percentage necessary to donate to a pre-determined charitable organization. 
Picture
Picture
The documentation of goals

Mentioned above, learners set four goals weekly, three of which are documented and accessible via their assessment folder (their personal goal is reflected upon in their digital portfolio). All three goals (SDUoI, Communications Skill and Math) all follow a similar process: Stated goal, successes, challenges and next steps. The expectation is to be media rich in the documentation and the students are generally their best judges as to when they've achieved mastery, or persevered long enough, on a particular goal. 

​Below are examples of each of these three documentation goal areas:
A documented communication skill example.
A documented math example.
A documented SDUoI example.
What about summative assessment?

As for whole Studio summatives, all advisors do some variety of one at the end of each SDUoI cycle, but I'd argue that it's more formative if anything as it is used to inform the next self-directed unit. The kiddos self reflect on their motivation, use of experts, get feedback from advisors and parents, then use all of this to inform how they should continue to push themselves further on their next endeavor. 

Because of the very nature of the personalized learning within the studio, children tend to summatively assess themselves actively and often, with advisor conferencing, when they feel they have persevered long enough on a goal. They have the documentation of their journey to prove it. Thus, there are summative assessments taking place, just on different timelines and in smaller doses.

Below is an example of a self-directed unit summative assessment...
How does all of the assessment mentioned above get communicated?

As mentioned above, the "one-stop-shop" hyperdoc assessment folder is shared with the parents at the beginning of the year. This keeps the transparency and communication window with parents entirely open from week one.

In addition, children reflect daily in their learning portfolio, which for most tends to be Seesaw.

Furthermore, several three-way conferences are held throughout the year. At each of these times, we tend to focus on different aspects of the AtLs. In our first conference, after term one, we looked solely at the self-management AtL family as it linked in nicely to our Who we are inquiry, specifically, who the children are as a learner (note that the enhanced AtLs were not yet released). 
Picture
For our most recent three-way conference, we used the enhanced AtLs to reflect on our growth up until that point. Each stakeholder chose two sub-skill strengths and growth areas, respectively. Then we discussed actionable steps together that our learners can use when setting goals within the Studio as well as support on how these goals can be achieved at home.
Picture
Finally, Studio 5 learners write their own evaluation of learning (EoL). Advisors support them through the writing process, and each term, they report on a different aspect of their growth as a learner. Sometimes it's math, other times it is their self-directed inquiries. All use the AtLs as a vehicle in which to benchmark their growth. Afterwards, advisors add a comment on the bottom, often just needing to show support for their honest, humble and very transparent reflections. 

The students writing their own EoLs was and still is one of the many things that I love about my current place of employment under my current role. It's such a powerful and purposeful form of authentic writing.

On that note, I would love to encourage everyone reading this to do the same. Even just once. See what the parents think! Why not have a go?!

The letting go is never easy when you are trying to establish a culture of learner agency. However, remember that with the right scaffolding and support, any human can be an empowered and capable agent of their own learning! It's extremely energizing!

​Here is an example of a more recent student written EoL ...
Picture

To wrap up ...

If you're new to agency and/or personalized learning, I'm sure there are still many questions that I have left unanswered. In addition, this is "our way", and much of the above is even more adapted to make work for my specific advisory. I'm not suggesting that it is "the" way. Always start, collaboratively, with your "why". Then determine what the "how" and "what" will look like in your context. 

Agency, in an educational setting, after all is about valuing voice, choice and ownership in one's learning. A good start would be linking to the concept of this blog post -- that of celebrating process, rather than product.

Growth does not have to be measured in grades or letters. Things are changing (albeit at a snail-like pace). Heck, even Harvard is pondering the very notion.

If you've gotten this far, I'd like to thank you for taking the time to read this rather lengthy post!

I'll also leave you with John Spencer's amazing video about what happens when students own their own learning (this message and more is also evident in his and Julianni's astounding book, Empower).

In what ways do you celebrate the journey over the destination?
What other ways that you track the growth of your learners beyond grades and numbers?
What are some of the ways you've "let go" and have introduced learner agency this year?
​---
Please add the answers to these, your feedback, comments, and/or suggestions below!
--
I do share ideas on this topic and more on Twitter (@juouelle)!
8 Comments
Ron Dixon
4/8/2019 04:22:35 pm

If you value the process over the end product so much, why haven't you gone through the process of evaluating the ATLs from the Enhanced PYP and deciding what is relevant at particular grades? Instead you have taken the (excellent) end product that another teacher from another school has created (having presumably gone through the process of evaluating the PYP ATLs and deciding what to change, since they are different to what is in Principles into Practice). If agency is at the centre of your philosophy, why not make these your own?

Reply
Justin
4/12/2019 05:29:54 am

Hi Ron,

Thanks for taking the time to reply and for your feedback.

Suzanne, who made the enhanced ATL document above, which is an adapted interpretation (also alluded to in my post above) is and will always be part of the Studio 5 family. She was part of Studio 5 1.0 and we still value her philosophies and pedagogical ideals in our family. Thus, that is why we have decided to use her creations (and interpretations) as part of assessment framework.

I hope that answers your question.

Reply
Ron Dixon
4/8/2019 04:30:45 pm

Excellent post, by the way! My last email is not a criticism but a suggestion!

Reply
Laura S
4/8/2019 11:06:34 pm

Such independence and autonomy! I would love to try this but I worry that the amount of time allocated to this approach would be taking time away from guided-inquiry units which could help students build the background knowledge and single-subject skills needed for them to engage with the disciplines as they progress through school life. How are you ensuring all students develop skills and knowledge from all subject areas and your own scope and sequences? Do you publish any formal results to parents or wider community so you/they can check how you compare with other schools (e.x. how do you know students are reading at age-appropriate age? how are your students' math attainment levels compared to other children their age?).

Finally, when reflecting the skills, using your image of self-management skills what the advisor/parent/student thinks are all really different. How does the student know exactly how well they are performing a skill if the feedback they get is confusing, like this?

Thank you for sharing your process with us all!

Reply
Justin
4/12/2019 11:42:08 am

Hi Laura,

Thanks so much for taking the time to reply and your honest feedback. :)

Yes, it does take a lot of time to create a paradigm shift in the way we all educate our learners for the future. However, the time and effort is extremely empowering - especially from a social and emotional standpoint of our learners.

My suggestion is to start small, but dream big. As mentioned above, the letting go is the hardest. I'm not sure if you're aware, but this is an excellent place for educators worldwide who know that a change is needed and are taking those first and next steps towards agency in their classroom (https://ibeducatorvoices.wordpress.com/).

I also thank you for taking the time to write in detail; I hope to respond to your questions in the same fashion as best as I can.

-----
To respond to "taking time away from guided-inquiry units which could help students build the background knowledge and single-subject skills needed for them to engage with the disciplines as they progress through school life", I'll respond in the appropriate amount of detail in which this deserves.
---

Mentioned above, we do still have single subjects that teach skills in depth. However, we're trying to make a push to open every aspect of out timetable. As I'll elucidate further along in my response, learning in authenticity (i.e. in real life) is transdisciplinary and needs open timetabling for those creative tendrils to fly. Life doesn't happen in 40 minute blocks. This response alone would take so much longer to get back into creative thoughtful "zones" if it were disjointed into learning blocks where I'd have to shut off writing and transition to "maths" or "art".

To elaborate on your deep, guided inquiry response, each SDUoI is technically deep and guided to a degree you would never see in a traditional classroom. I know because I've taught in traditional models for over 15 years.

Where it differs in Studio 5 is that it is not just guided by one advisor. As advisors, we connect students with mentors, advisors and experts within our community, locally and globally. Every SDUoI is grouped by a category (e.g. writers, artists, designers, filmers, etc.) then attached to a specific advisor who has a passion or link to that area of expertise. Advisors are also hired to be largely varied in their skillsets to help make this magic come alive.

To make this more clear, I'll illuminate one example of the many. Recently, a group of learners wanted to learn how to make shoes. They learned 3D rendering software, spoke to a local major shoe producer, got a representative to come in as a guest speaker, then used their communication skills to persuade the representative for a field trip (all under our guidance, suggestion and support only when they needed it). They planned their own field trip to the shoe factory. They got real feedback on their designs from an expert (that they surveyed interests from their peers and graphed the results out first; empathizing with their audience), then went on to use design thinking to make their design even better. Later, they went on to teach other kids in the school shoe design and design thinking by running workshops, further honing their oral communication and presentation skills. In this example, these learners learned how to manage their time, set goals each week on something they were deeply passionate about, worked creatively and collaboratively, write emails, jumped through all the red tape to make their field trip happen, organized transport, learned measurement skills in authenticity and worked with other authentic math problems (e.g. elapsed time, using maps, data representation, division and more). Furthermore, they synthesized information, transferred it into new contexts, honed their presentation skills, thought like graphic designers, created advertisements. I could go on, yet I think I have elucidated the depth and transdisciplinary nature of these inquires. My only problem was telling them that they had to go home at the end of the day or to leave the advisory to go out and play.

That was just one example of over 60 units of inquiry that we had.

Learning in real life is not stand-alone; it is transdisciplinary and embedded in authentic contexts. It happens like the example above. Think of any real world project that you've engaged with in your life.

Here's an example that I'll share to ground my argument. Recently, I needed to switch brokerage houses. I researched, read, synthesized, reached out to experts, Skyped, asked questions, filled out paperwork, worked out costs, persuaded and bargained, made compromises, used digital literacy and more all to make that happen. It didn't happen in disjointed 40 or 80 minute blocks either. I also needed brain breaks, time to be creative in other works, play sport and communicate and connect socially. That's the authentic world and that's what Studio 5 looks like.

To further ground my argument on shifting the paradigm of education (

Reply
Justin
4/12/2019 12:13:48 pm

Laura,

I'm sorry... I did reply to your questions in detail, but there's a cap and I lost what I wrote.

Ultimately, we, in Studio 5, don't value content driven education, we value the works of Holt, Papert, Piaget and Vygotsky to shape our ideals. To make this quick and easy for you, search their names with "quotes", then go to images.

More modernly, the Sundance film, "Most likely to succeed" is a good, in depth highlight of who we are and what we value. On Youtube, I'd recommend the Edutopia interview with High Tech High's principal or any of the reviews to get a synthesized take.

As Mitch Resnick, author of Lifelong Kindergarten, whom works at MIT's Media Lab, creator of Scratch, schools like to "treasure what we can measure". He goes on to discuss the relevance of trying to measure creativity (https://photos.app.goo.gl/LzP7tw8r1uGusvUi7).

Studio 5 departs from Frederick Taylor's pernicious factory model of education. If I were to say if there were a few things that I could share that would may be provocations to your question surrounding curriculum (and to keep it short and sweet), it would be these:

- Search up "World Economic Forum 2022 Skills" - Then click images. What do you notice? What is the connection to what Studio 5 values?
- How often in your career have you had to relearn a "standard" in order to teach it? Just ask yourself each time you do that, "When was the last time you used what you're teaching in authenticity, #IRL?
- All educators and parents need to take the 29 minutes to watch Heather McGowan's Keynote on the Future of Work (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1592&v=gsDzYXXNeRs). She wrote a Forbes article on the topic this week. It is transformative in the way that education should be shaped.
- Alvin Toffler's quote is most salient..."The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn." Yuval Harari, author of Sapiens, would concur (https://medium.com/s/youthnow/yuval-noah-harari-21-lessons-21st-century-what-kids-need-to-learn-now-to-succeed-in-2050-1b72a3fb4bcf).

Justin
4/12/2019 12:44:32 pm

To answer your second question...

"Do you publish any formal results to parents or wider community so you/they can check how you compare with other schools (e.x. how do you know students are reading at age-appropriate age? how are your students' math attainment levels compared to other children their age?)"

We do one standardized test (we, as a school don't have agency on that one, otherwise we'd scrap it). We don't value the data, yet do give it to parents if they ask for it. We educate parents that it is as abstract and unauthentic as an 8-track. We value our other data points (Gloss, Probe, and learning needs identified through their authentic transdisciplinary inquiries). These are communicated and shared from week one with parents. Our kids, from our data points, do read mostly above grade level and you can be the judge as to where our children are for their age level through the writing sample posted above, which would be representative of the cohort.

This is a by product of learning through their passions on a daily basis. It is not through us prescribing what they should be writing and reading.

As for math, specifically in relation to the standardized test, number isn't an issue, but where we may fall short on are questions like knowing the vertices in a nonogon (of which, ironically, my Grammarly add-on says is a spelling error). We're okay with that. Of the 3% of parents who do question this, we have a three-way conference, address the areas that they are concerned with and have an honest conversation about when these were last used by them in an authentic context.

For the follow-up question here that often gets asked is, "What about when my students transition to another school?". Not a worry; I fill out these transition forms all the time. They ask for transcripts, of which, you would only see non-graded EoLs like the ones posted above. Thankfully, all of the ones I've filled out recently, ask about character traits or skills that are closely related to our AtLs.

We've never had a child turned down.

Part of the reason why is that, when interviewed (many schools do a video conference now), our kids can sell their brand. They are extremely confident communicators who know exactly what their strengths are, their next steps in their learning, are reflective, articulate and know how to advocate for what's best. Why? They do it all the time through peer-to-peer collaboration, leading their own workshops and more.

It is often in the feedback of our visitors as well. Of which, you're more than welcome to be our guest to have your questions answered, in person!

Justin
4/12/2019 01:13:05 pm

To answer your last question...

"Finally, when reflecting the skills, using your image of self-management skills what the advisor/parent/student thinks are all really different. How does the student know exactly how well they are performing a skill if the feedback they get is confusing, like this?"

The two, 3-way conference conversations scaffolds that I posted in the blog above were from the same learner. When we conference, I do ask questions like, "I notice that you think you're leading in your informed choices, yet mum and dad and your advisor think you are different. Would you care to advocate why that is so?" Then, we would have honest conversations about why we think differently and talk about how to best support that.

To counter your "confusing" statement, perhaps I was too vague above. I'd argue that the second conversational scaffold, happening mid year, proves the first to be an excellent contrast in growth. Mum and dad now would say that this child is strong in their informed choices. I'd argue that I think the same with the enhanced communication skill of being able to "Form Decisions." Again, these are visuals that get documented in their assessment folders and stand to serve as great visuals to show each child's growth as a learner throughout the year.

Yes, switching AtLs mid year was not ideal, but that was due to the PYP enhancements.

I think it is important to note that here that we do take transparency and communication with parents very seriously. Some are skeptical at first, but come mid-year, they see their children the happiest, most confident they've been and really shining in so many skills as a byproduct from having their learning handed over to them.

Just recently we held a two hour parent event for new parents for next year. We start by surveying the parents in what they want to know, honoring their agency. They, too, wanted to know "why" we are doing things differently. We started with several provocations in a "Chalk Talk". One was related to what did they learn in school that was not relevant to their real life. Many wrote about asked to remember facts, various forms of writing, and others about maths.

By talking honestly and openly like this and valuing everyone's agency, parents quickly see that we're not just experimenting with their children (albeit this could be argued for all educational institutions). They come to see that we have their child's best interest at heart, yet just in a more personalized way.

----

It's getting late and hopefully my second attempts to answer your questions weren't rattled off too quickly to offend.

I truly do hope that you can come visit us one day to see the learning in action. It really is an energizing, engaging and empowering atmosphere!




Leave a Reply.

    Author

    PYP educator | Father | Husband | Life-long learner | Nature lover | Technology enthusiast | Sports hobbyist

    Archives

    October 2020
    April 2020
    April 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018

    Categories

    All
    IPad
    Metacognition
    Reflection
    Voice

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Passions
  • Experience
  • Learning
    • COETAIL >
      • Orientation
      • Course One
      • Course Two
      • Course Three
      • Course Four
      • Course Five
  • Blog